|
|
@@ -387,11 +387,26 @@ func (pool *TxPool) reset(oldHead, newHead *types.Header) {
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
// Reorg seems shallow enough to pull in all transactions into memory
|
|
|
var discarded, included types.Transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
rem = pool.chain.GetBlock(oldHead.Hash(), oldHead.Number.Uint64())
|
|
|
add = pool.chain.GetBlock(newHead.Hash(), newHead.Number.Uint64())
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
+ if rem == nil {
|
|
|
+ // This can happen if a setHead is performed, where we simply discard the old
|
|
|
+ // head from the chain.
|
|
|
+ // If that is the case, we don't have the lost transactions any more, and
|
|
|
+ // there's nothing to add
|
|
|
+ if newNum < oldNum {
|
|
|
+ // If the reorg ended up on a lower number, it's indicative of setHead being the cause
|
|
|
+ log.Debug("Skipping transaction reset caused by setHead",
|
|
|
+ "old", oldHead.Hash(), "oldnum", oldNum, "new", newHead.Hash(), "newnum", newNum)
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
+ // If we reorged to a same or higher number, then it's not a case of setHead
|
|
|
+ log.Warn("Transaction pool reset with missing oldhead",
|
|
|
+ "old", oldHead.Hash(), "oldnum", oldNum, "new", newHead.Hash(), "newnum", newNum)
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ return
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
for rem.NumberU64() > add.NumberU64() {
|
|
|
discarded = append(discarded, rem.Transactions()...)
|
|
|
if rem = pool.chain.GetBlock(rem.ParentHash(), rem.NumberU64()-1); rem == nil {
|