|
|
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ func TestSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Tests that simple synchronization against a canonical chain works correctly.
|
|
|
// In this test common ancestor lookup should be short circuited and not require
|
|
|
// binary searching.
|
|
|
-func TestCanonicalSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestCanonicalSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Create a small enough block chain to download
|
|
|
targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
|
|
|
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
@@ -291,69 +291,16 @@ func TestCanonicalSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a large batch of blocks are being downloaded, it is throttled
|
|
|
// until the cached blocks are retrieved.
|
|
|
-func TestThrottling60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
- // Create a long block chain to download and the tester
|
|
|
- targetBlocks := 8 * blockCacheLimit
|
|
|
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- tester := newTester()
|
|
|
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth60, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Wrap the importer to allow stepping
|
|
|
- done := make(chan int)
|
|
|
- tester.downloader.insertChain = func(blocks types.Blocks) (int, error) {
|
|
|
- n, err := tester.insertChain(blocks)
|
|
|
- done <- n
|
|
|
- return n, err
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- // Start a synchronisation concurrently
|
|
|
- errc := make(chan error)
|
|
|
- go func() {
|
|
|
- errc <- tester.sync("peer")
|
|
|
- }()
|
|
|
- // Iteratively take some blocks, always checking the retrieval count
|
|
|
- for len(tester.ownBlocks) < targetBlocks+1 {
|
|
|
- // Wait a bit for sync to throttle itself
|
|
|
- var cached int
|
|
|
- for start := time.Now(); time.Since(start) < 3*time.Second; {
|
|
|
- time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- cached = len(tester.downloader.queue.blockPool)
|
|
|
- if cached == blockCacheLimit || len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached == targetBlocks+1 {
|
|
|
- break
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- // Make sure we filled up the cache, then exhaust it
|
|
|
- time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond) // give it a chance to screw up
|
|
|
- if cached != blockCacheLimit && len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached < targetBlocks+1 {
|
|
|
- t.Fatalf("block count mismatch: have %v, want %v", cached, blockCacheLimit)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- <-done // finish previous blocking import
|
|
|
- for cached > maxBlockProcess {
|
|
|
- cached -= <-done
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond) // yield to the insertion
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- <-done // finish the last blocking import
|
|
|
+func TestThrottling60(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, eth60) }
|
|
|
+func TestThrottling61(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, eth61) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // Check that we haven't pulled more blocks than available
|
|
|
- if len(tester.ownBlocks) > targetBlocks+1 {
|
|
|
- t.Fatalf("target block count mismatch: have %v, want %v", len(tester.ownBlocks), targetBlocks+1)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- if err := <-errc; err != nil {
|
|
|
- t.Fatalf("block synchronization failed: %v", err)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-// Tests that if a large batch of blocks are being downloaded, it is throttled
|
|
|
-// until the cached blocks are retrieved.
|
|
|
-func TestThrottling(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func testThrottling(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
|
|
|
// Create a long block chain to download and the tester
|
|
|
targetBlocks := 8 * blockCacheLimit
|
|
|
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth61, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
+ tester.newPeer("peer", protocol, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wrap the importer to allow stepping
|
|
|
done := make(chan int)
|
|
|
@@ -404,7 +351,7 @@ func TestThrottling(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Tests that simple synchronization against a forked chain works correctly. In
|
|
|
// this test common ancestor lookup should *not* be short circuited, and a full
|
|
|
// binary search should be executed.
|
|
|
-func TestForkedSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestForkedSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Create a long enough forked chain
|
|
|
common, fork := MaxHashFetch, 2*MaxHashFetch
|
|
|
hashesA, hashesB, blocksA, blocksB := makeChainFork(common+fork, fork, genesis)
|
|
|
@@ -443,33 +390,10 @@ func TestInactiveDownloader(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that a canceled download wipes all previously accumulated state.
|
|
|
-func TestCancel60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
- // Create a small enough block chain to download and the tester
|
|
|
- targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
|
|
|
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- tester := newTester()
|
|
|
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth60, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
+func TestCancel60(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, eth60) }
|
|
|
+func TestCancel61(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, eth61) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // Make sure canceling works with a pristine downloader
|
|
|
- tester.downloader.cancel()
|
|
|
- hashCount, blockCount := tester.downloader.queue.Size()
|
|
|
- if hashCount > 0 || blockCount > 0 {
|
|
|
- t.Errorf("block or hash count mismatch: %d hashes, %d blocks, want 0", hashCount, blockCount)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- // Synchronise with the peer, but cancel afterwards
|
|
|
- if err := tester.sync("peer"); err != nil {
|
|
|
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- tester.downloader.cancel()
|
|
|
- hashCount, blockCount = tester.downloader.queue.Size()
|
|
|
- if hashCount > 0 || blockCount > 0 {
|
|
|
- t.Errorf("block or hash count mismatch: %d hashes, %d blocks, want 0", hashCount, blockCount)
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-// Tests that a canceled download wipes all previously accumulated state.
|
|
|
-func TestCancel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func testCancel(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
|
|
|
// Create a small enough block chain to download and the tester
|
|
|
targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
|
|
|
if targetBlocks >= MaxHashFetch {
|
|
|
@@ -478,7 +402,7 @@ func TestCancel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth61, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
+ tester.newPeer("peer", protocol, hashes, blocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure canceling works with a pristine downloader
|
|
|
tester.downloader.cancel()
|
|
|
@@ -498,7 +422,10 @@ func TestCancel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that synchronisation from multiple peers works as intended (multi thread sanity test).
|
|
|
-func TestMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestMultiSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, eth60) }
|
|
|
+func TestMultiSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, eth61) }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+func testMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
|
|
|
// Create various peers with various parts of the chain
|
|
|
targetPeers := 16
|
|
|
targetBlocks := targetPeers*blockCacheLimit - 15
|
|
|
@@ -507,7 +434,7 @@ func TestMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < targetPeers; i++ {
|
|
|
id := fmt.Sprintf("peer #%d", i)
|
|
|
- tester.newPeer(id, eth60, hashes[i*blockCacheLimit:], blocks)
|
|
|
+ tester.newPeer(id, protocol, hashes[i*blockCacheLimit:], blocks)
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
// Synchronise with the middle peer and make sure half of the blocks were retrieved
|
|
|
id := fmt.Sprintf("peer #%d", targetPeers/2)
|
|
|
@@ -528,7 +455,7 @@ func TestMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that synchronising with a peer who's very slow at network IO does not
|
|
|
// stall the other peers in the system.
|
|
|
-func TestSlowSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestSlowSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a batch of blocks, with a slow and a full speed peer
|
|
|
@@ -557,7 +484,7 @@ func TestSlowSynchronisation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a peer returns an invalid chain with a block pointing to a non-
|
|
|
// existing parent, it is correctly detected and handled.
|
|
|
-func TestNonExistingParentAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestNonExistingParentAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Forge a single-link chain with a forged header
|
|
|
@@ -587,7 +514,7 @@ func TestNonExistingParentAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a malicious peers keeps sending us repeating hashes, we don't
|
|
|
// loop indefinitely.
|
|
|
-func TestRepeatingHashAttack(t *testing.T) { // TODO: Is this thing valid??
|
|
|
+func TestRepeatingHashAttack60(t *testing.T) { // TODO: Is this thing valid??
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a valid chain, but drop the last link
|
|
|
@@ -617,7 +544,7 @@ func TestRepeatingHashAttack(t *testing.T) { // TODO: Is this thing valid??
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a malicious peers returns a non-existent block hash, it should
|
|
|
// eventually time out and the sync reattempted.
|
|
|
-func TestNonExistingBlockAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestNonExistingBlockAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a valid chain, but forge the last link
|
|
|
@@ -639,7 +566,7 @@ func TestNonExistingBlockAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a malicious peer is returning hashes in a weird order, that the
|
|
|
// sync throttler doesn't choke on them waiting for the valid blocks.
|
|
|
-func TestInvalidHashOrderAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestInvalidHashOrderAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a valid long chain, but reverse some hashes within
|
|
|
@@ -667,7 +594,7 @@ func TestInvalidHashOrderAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a malicious peer makes up a random hash chain and tries to push
|
|
|
// indefinitely, it actually gets caught with it.
|
|
|
-func TestMadeupHashChainAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestMadeupHashChainAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
tester := newTester()
|
|
|
blockSoftTTL = 100 * time.Millisecond
|
|
|
crossCheckCycle = 25 * time.Millisecond
|
|
|
@@ -697,7 +624,7 @@ func TestMadeupHashChainAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// indefinitely, one hash at a time, it actually gets caught with it. The reason
|
|
|
// this is separate from the classical made up chain attack is that sending hashes
|
|
|
// one by one prevents reliable block/parent verification.
|
|
|
-func TestMadeupHashChainDrippingAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestMadeupHashChainDrippingAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Create a random chain of hashes to drip
|
|
|
randomHashes := make([]common.Hash, 16*blockCacheLimit)
|
|
|
for i := range randomHashes {
|
|
|
@@ -716,7 +643,7 @@ func TestMadeupHashChainDrippingAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that if a malicious peer makes up a random block chain, and tried to
|
|
|
// push indefinitely, it actually gets caught with it.
|
|
|
-func TestMadeupBlockChainAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestMadeupBlockChainAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
defaultBlockTTL := blockSoftTTL
|
|
|
defaultCrossCheckCycle := crossCheckCycle
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -748,7 +675,7 @@ func TestMadeupBlockChainAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Tests that if one/multiple malicious peers try to feed a banned blockchain to
|
|
|
// the downloader, it will not keep refetching the same chain indefinitely, but
|
|
|
// gradually block pieces of it, until its head is also blocked.
|
|
|
-func TestBannedChainStarvationAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestBannedChainStarvationAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
n := 8 * blockCacheLimit
|
|
|
fork := n/2 - 23
|
|
|
hashes, forkHashes, blocks, forkBlocks := makeChainFork(n, fork, genesis)
|
|
|
@@ -792,7 +719,7 @@ func TestBannedChainStarvationAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Tests that if a peer sends excessively many/large invalid chains that are
|
|
|
// gradually banned, it will have an upper limit on the consumed memory and also
|
|
|
// the origin bad hashes will not be evacuated.
|
|
|
-func TestBannedChainMemoryExhaustionAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestBannedChainMemoryExhaustionAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Construct a banned chain with more chunks than the ban limit
|
|
|
n := 8 * blockCacheLimit
|
|
|
fork := n/2 - 23
|
|
|
@@ -848,7 +775,7 @@ func TestBannedChainMemoryExhaustionAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// internal state problems
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
// No, don't delete this test, it actually did happen!
|
|
|
-func TestOverlappingDeliveryAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+func TestOverlappingDeliveryAttack60(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Create an arbitrary batch of blocks ( < cache-size not to block)
|
|
|
targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 23
|
|
|
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
|
|
|
@@ -875,6 +802,16 @@ func TestOverlappingDeliveryAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+// Tests that a peer advertising an high TD doesn't get to stall the downloader
|
|
|
+// afterwards by not sending any useful hashes.
|
|
|
+func TestHighTDStarvationAttack61(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
+ tester := newTester()
|
|
|
+ tester.newPeer("attack", eth61, []common.Hash{genesis.Hash()}, nil)
|
|
|
+ if err := tester.sync("attack"); err != errStallingPeer {
|
|
|
+ t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errStallingPeer)
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
// Tests that misbehaving peers are disconnected, whilst behaving ones are not.
|
|
|
func TestHashAttackerDropping(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
// Define the disconnection requirement for individual hash fetch errors
|